Rileigh Bandy, Teresa Portone, Mohammad Khalil, Eric Crislip, Kyle Neal
This paper compares embedded and staged data-driven closure learning for dynamical systems, showing that while embedded approaches offer higher accuracy, staged methods using data assimilation achieve comparable qualitative results with significantly lower computational cost and greater robustness. The staged approach avoids repeated simulator calls during training, making it more efficient for real-world applications.
Efficient closure modeling is critical for real-time simulations and design optimization in complex systems like epidemiological models. By reducing computational overhead without sacrificing much accuracy, staged approaches enable scalable deployment of data-driven models in resource-constrained environments.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. arxiv.org. aibrief.ai is not affiliated with or endorsed by arXiv.